Hillary vs. Obama
Friday, February 23rd, 2007 
It sure seems like Hilary Clinton wants to be president because she would get that “leader of the free world” title not because she has much interest in helping the citizens of America. Don’t get me wrong I’m not naive enough to believe that anyone gets to be in a position to run for president let alone win the presidency without doing some pretty fine contortions of beliefs and dare I say ethics. But what the Obama flap this week points out is that she’s a bit too tone deaf to maneuver as well as her husband did. She’s a bit ham-fisted about wielding her power and that is what critics tie the “unlikable’ label to. Meanwhile, Obama has star-power and charisma; are they the ultimate test of a good president? No, but they are more essential than policy wonks will let on. If John F. Kennedy had not been killed in his first term it would have been interesting to see how long the Camelot thing could have played out. The Civil Rights struggle would have been a different animal had he been at the helm rather than LBJ and if Vietnam had blown up in his face as it was bound to there would be no chance at being the Elvis of Pennsylvania Avenue. Keep in mind that I grew up on Cape Cod and what I'm saying would be considered sacrilegious.
But what Barrack Obama did at the Democratic National Convention was appeal to people vision of change, whatever that might look like to you, see that it is possible to change your world imagine it better. Rather than get into the nuts and bolts of how to put a man on the moon I’m standing here and telling you “we will do it, are you with me?” That’s powerful stuff and certainly worth the price of admission.



